1/1/2024 0 Comments Gnu pspp download windows![]() ![]() Re: pspp-1.6.0 released, 1.6 windows, ft gmail, 2.pspp-1.6.0 released, 1.6 for windows, someone, 2.pspp-1.6.0 released, 1.6 for windows, (continued).> I know 1.6 is at the nightly untested builds. ![]() > Any plans for when the 1.6 version for windows to be released? > when i installed it on my windows pc, and clicked on about, it said This still seems to be the 1.5 version? At least > I went to the download page and got the version for windows. So I suggest that you try a different mirror or use the > Perhaps you were looking at a mirror site? (some mirrors are a little slow > does have version 1.6 (scroll down to the bottom). > The 1.6 version files down at the bottom of the download list are > and it is 1.6, so maybe use the nightly version? But the nightly version is available there, > The windows installer currently in the pspp download page > windows installers for nightly builds are untested nightly builds." ![]() > main download page, especially since the main download page says "The > I could list the nightly download page, but I'm much prefer to list the > I'd like to list the most recent version on the 'official' or main > I'm happy to update the webpage to point to a 1.6 build for Windows, if > build page be moved to where the main gnu.org pspp download page points? > where they both point? Or could the 1.6 build for windows on the nightly > Aren't the gnu.org pspp download and nightly build pages pointing to pspp So now it points to the released 1.6.0 install exe. > i made a seperate windows 1.6.0 installer download directory > but I don't think it's appropriate to host Windows binaries (or other > I can change the links on gnu.org to point to a known-good Windows binary, ![]() > Subject: Re: pspp-1.6.0 released, 1.6 windows > not? I don't think this gnu page is -hosting- a windows binary, just pointing > appropriate for the gnu page to -point to- a windows version of pspp? Why Modern source control requirements aside (git integration), vscode really has a ton of creature comforts like a built-in terminal, plugins up the wazoo with support for just about anything, and is EXTREMELY customizable.> Friedrich, thanks very much. I open each file it its own editor window and run commands or the debugger from a separate xterm.That's fair. And I really don't like screen-filling IDEs. I already developed just fine, on Linux, without it. Unless I need to do something serious, it's hard for me to see how it would suit my needs any better than Cygwin/X.īut, I don't use VSCode. Probably the biggest benefit is that I can ssh w/ X tunneling and remotely run GUI programs on my Linux boxes. The point is that I install it and get wget for "free". I probably wouldn't install it just for wget, but that wasn't the point. īit_user said:Cygwin? Given that it's most of the userspace environment + components as you get on a typical Linux distro, it's really quite an easy and painless experience. Type wget -r or wget -recursive to download recursively.However, from a practical point of view, you may find that most web servers will block this level of scraping, so you’ll need to tread carefully. Theoretically, Wget can run with an infinite depth level, meaning it’ll never stop trying to go further and deeper with the content it downloads. Depending on the recursive depth you choose, it can also download any pages that are linked to it, as well as the content on those pages, any pages that are linked on those pages, and so on. Instead of only downloading a single file, it’ll instead try to download an entire directory of related files.įor instance, if you specify a web page, it’ll download the content attached to that page (such as images). One of Wget’s most useful features is the ability to download recursively. If you run into trouble with Wget, make sure to limit the number of retries you make and set a wait limit for each download you attempt. Make sure to use the wget -h or wget -help command to view the full list of options that are available to you. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |